Standardized tests
This
reading is intended to talk about standardized tests that in fact, they play an
important role in education since they are necessary and sometime useful, but
in the same breath they are really harmful because they are not objective.
I would like to point out some
disadvantages standardized tests have; for instance, as I said before the only
objective thing standardized tests have is scoring, when done by an accurately
programmed machine. But deciding what items to include on the test, how
questions are worded, which answers are scored as "correct,” and the uses
of exam results are all made by subjective human beings. On the other hand, these
kinds of tests are very poor in the sense that they don’t improve critical
thinking skills of student learning. They are weak measures of the ability to
comprehend complex material. Besides, these tests do not help a teacher
understand what to do next in working with a student because they do not
indicate how the student learns or thinks.
Anyway they also have some
advantages, for example they are easier to score, they are useful for some
institutions in order to level some students, and they are necessary to take
when an English teacher wants to get a better job or keep studying. It is very
important here in Colombia and I guess that in other countries is the same. I am going to give an example, it happened to
a friend of mine; he applied for a job in an English Institute here in Bucaramanga,
and everything was going good till the coordinator asked him for a certification
of any test, and my friend said he didn’t have any test certification, so he couldn’t
get the job just for this reason.
As a short conclusion I
would say that standardized tests are not fear enough, or objective, but they
are necessary and useful sometimes, so we sooner or later we as future teachers
have to face them.

